<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coke vs. Pepsi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialreflections.com/coke-vs-pepsi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/coke-vs-pepsi/</link>
	<description>Social to Search And Everything In Between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:41:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: website outsourcing</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/coke-vs-pepsi/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>website outsourcing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 03:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=586#comment-791</guid>
		<description>It is really a nice post, it is always great reading such posts, this post is good in regards of both knowledge as well as information. Very fascinating read, thanks for sharing this post here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really a nice post, it is always great reading such posts, this post is good in regards of both knowledge as well as information. Very fascinating read, thanks for sharing this post here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USB 3G</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/coke-vs-pepsi/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>USB 3G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 07:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=586#comment-790</guid>
		<description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, good news for me,&lt;br&gt;thanks!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, good news for me,<br />thanks!</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VA</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/coke-vs-pepsi/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=586#comment-134</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting comparison. It might also be a comment on the power of being first to market and then holding that position. The imitator dropped the &quot;cola&quot; part of their logo in 1962, maybe trying to make it less obvious that they were emulating Coke&#039;s logo as well as their product. They also are repeatedly changing their logo reputedly to appeal to &quot;new&quot; generations of consumers. Interestingly, Coke changed their product unsuccessfully a couple of decades ago and had to change it back when consumers complained.
In conclusion, it is difficult to say just from the comparison of logos over time whether the Pepsi and Coke history is reflective of successful marketing or of just a different strategy.

Anyway, great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting comparison. It might also be a comment on the power of being first to market and then holding that position. The imitator dropped the &#8220;cola&#8221; part of their logo in 1962, maybe trying to make it less obvious that they were emulating Coke&#8217;s logo as well as their product. They also are repeatedly changing their logo reputedly to appeal to &#8220;new&#8221; generations of consumers. Interestingly, Coke changed their product unsuccessfully a couple of decades ago and had to change it back when consumers complained.<br />
In conclusion, it is difficult to say just from the comparison of logos over time whether the Pepsi and Coke history is reflective of successful marketing or of just a different strategy.</p>
<p>Anyway, great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/coke-vs-pepsi/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=586#comment-133</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting comparison. It might also be a comment on the power of being first to market and then holding that position. The imitator dropped the &quot;cola&quot; part of their logo in 1962, maybe trying to make it less obvious that they were emulating Coke&#039;s logo as well as their product. They also are repeatedly changing their logo reputedly to appeal to &quot;new&quot; generations of consumers. Interestingly, Coke changed their product unsuccessfully a couple of decades ago and had to change it back when consumers complained.
In conclusion, it is difficult to say just from the comparison of logos over time whether the Pepsi and Coke history is reflective of successful marketing or of just a different strategy.

Anyway, great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting comparison. It might also be a comment on the power of being first to market and then holding that position. The imitator dropped the &#8220;cola&#8221; part of their logo in 1962, maybe trying to make it less obvious that they were emulating Coke&#8217;s logo as well as their product. They also are repeatedly changing their logo reputedly to appeal to &#8220;new&#8221; generations of consumers. Interestingly, Coke changed their product unsuccessfully a couple of decades ago and had to change it back when consumers complained.<br />
In conclusion, it is difficult to say just from the comparison of logos over time whether the Pepsi and Coke history is reflective of successful marketing or of just a different strategy.</p>
<p>Anyway, great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

