<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judged by the Quality of Your Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialreflections.com/judged-by-the-quality-of-your-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/judged-by-the-quality-of-your-comments/</link>
	<description>The Business of Social Media by Shailesh Ghimire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:56:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: swollenpickles</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/judged-by-the-quality-of-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>swollenpickles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 02:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=69#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I found that when I added the dofollow plugin to one of my wordpress blogs the number of comments I received sky rocketed, whilst the quality of the comments nose dived. It was on a music recording/engineering blog, so it&#039;s not a common topic, and the people that commented just for the back link stood out like... something that sticks out a lot.

In terms of the comments themselves, spelling errors etc. don&#039;t really bother me, it&#039;s when people try and include a signatures at the bottom of the comment as well as using the Name field to stuff obvious keywords (eg. Name: Budget Atlanta Accomodation) that I feel Hulk like rage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that when I added the dofollow plugin to one of my wordpress blogs the number of comments I received sky rocketed, whilst the quality of the comments nose dived. It was on a music recording/engineering blog, so it&#8217;s not a common topic, and the people that commented just for the back link stood out like&#8230; something that sticks out a lot.</p>
<p>In terms of the comments themselves, spelling errors etc. don&#8217;t really bother me, it&#8217;s when people try and include a signatures at the bottom of the comment as well as using the Name field to stuff obvious keywords (eg. Name: Budget Atlanta Accomodation) that I feel Hulk like rage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Building Blog Readership One Comment at a Time &#124; The AIR Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/judged-by-the-quality-of-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Building Blog Readership One Comment at a Time &#124; The AIR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=69#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] reader) on a regular basis and start commenting on their posts. I mean leave relevant, thoughtful comments directly related to the post at hand. Do not leave blatant self promotional messages and never just leave your URL. Many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reader) on a regular basis and start commenting on their posts. I mean leave relevant, thoughtful comments directly related to the post at hand. Do not leave blatant self promotional messages and never just leave your URL. Many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shailesh Ghimire</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/judged-by-the-quality-of-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Ghimire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=69#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Sally,

That is a good point. I&#039;m going to keep that in mind for the future. It&#039;s good to know that people are willing to separate the post from the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sally,</p>
<p>That is a good point. I&#8217;m going to keep that in mind for the future. It&#8217;s good to know that people are willing to separate the post from the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/judged-by-the-quality-of-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=69#comment-39</guid>
		<description>By correcting spelling and grammar in comments left on your blog, aren&#039;t you lifting the credibility of those who&#039;ve left the comments?  A poorly edited comment, in my opinion, is no reflection on the quality and credibility of the original poster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By correcting spelling and grammar in comments left on your blog, aren&#8217;t you lifting the credibility of those who&#8217;ve left the comments?  A poorly edited comment, in my opinion, is no reflection on the quality and credibility of the original poster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.socialreflections.com/judged-by-the-quality-of-your-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialreflections.com/?p=69#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Very much appreciate your point about good grammar in posts and blogs. Too often, I find myself thinking poorly of blogs (and by extension, the blog authors) simply because the sentence structure and grammar are so poor. At minimum, it says that the author isn&#039;t put much effort into what he or she is doing or saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very much appreciate your point about good grammar in posts and blogs. Too often, I find myself thinking poorly of blogs (and by extension, the blog authors) simply because the sentence structure and grammar are so poor. At minimum, it says that the author isn&#8217;t put much effort into what he or she is doing or saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
